Sumner ME passes more protective wind ordinance than DEP regulates

Pretty amazing: a small Maine community is taking back responsibility from the wind turbine developers and the State of Maine for protecting turbine neighbors. They have examples like Vinalhaven, Mars and Record Hill, that went badly wrong. Some high points from the news report, “It (the ordinance) requires town officials to investigate all complaints and to require compliance with the ordinance. The town can hire needed experts at the developer’s expense. Under DEP guidelines residents must hire their own experts and attorneys to enforce compliance or pursue complaints.” “Voters agreed to let nonresident property owner Chris Dwinal speak. He said the vote was not “for” or “against” wind power but rather was a vote on whether developers were bound by the inadequate DEP guidelines or by an ordinance that protected residents and their property value.”

TOM STANDARD PHOTO

A standing-room-only crowd of 239 voters and visitors were in the Sumner Fire Station on Wednesday night to pass an Industrial Wind Power Ordinance.

Tom Standard, Special to the Sun Journal
Oxford Hills |

Thursday, May 17, 2012

SUMNER — Voters passed the Industrial Wind Power Ordinance on Wednesday night by a 2-1 ratio at a standing-room-only special town meeting in the fire barn.

TOM STANDARD PHOTO

Sumner resident Morgan Lueck registers to vote before a special town meeting Wednesday night that overwhelmingly passed an Industrial Wind Power Ordinance.

TOM STANDARD PHOTO

Sumner Town Clerk Susan Runes swears in Glen Holmes as moderator Wednesday night. Holmes, the director of Western Maine Economic Development Council, conducted the special town meeting where an overflow crowd in the fire station adopted an Industrial Wind Power Ordinance by the overwhelming vote of 159-79.

The vote was 159-79. One person cast a blank ballot.

Western Maine Economic Development Council Director Glen Holmes moderated the meeting.

Industrial Wind Power Ordinance Committee member Jeff Pfeifer asked Holmes to clarify what a yes and a no vote meant.

Holmes explained that if the ordinance was adopted with a yes vote, it would regulate wind power development in Sumner. If it was defeated by a no vote, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection guidelines would prevail.

The vote was the culmination of nearly 12 months of work by the committee, which has been working during a moratorium on wind power projects.

The town was approached last year with an informal proposal by Clear Sky Energy LLC of Barnstable, Mass., to erect five wind turbines on Spruce Hills, which includes, Mount Tom in the southwest area of town off Decoster Road.

Resident Pamela Cheesman pointed out that the DEP guidelines are relatively weak. They require a setback of only one and one half times the tower height where the ordinance requires 1 mile from the tower to the nearest non-participating landowner’s property line.

Voters agreed to let nonresident property owner Chris Dwinal speak. He said the vote was not “for” or “against” wind power but rather was a vote on whether developers were bound by the inadequate DEP guidelines or by an ordinance that protected residents and their property value.

He pointed out that the committee members were the local experts on wind power since they had spent many hours doing research. He indicated that a strong ordinance put the town in a better bargaining position if a developer wished to build a wind facility in Sumner.

In addition to requiring a 1-mile setback, the ordinance has several other features committee members say will protect residents and the town.

It requires the developer to post a performance bond for removing the towers and restoring the site. The DEP does not require such a safeguard and it says towns may be forced to bear the decommissioning cost if the developer abandons the towers.

It requires town officials to investigate all complaints and to require compliance with the ordinance. The town can hire needed experts at the developer’s expense. Under DEP guidelines residents must hire their own experts and attorneys to enforce compliance or pursue complaints.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: