Archive for the ‘Public health’ Category

Wind industry lobbyist apologizes

April 25, 2013

Lobbyist for wind power apologizes to Vt. panel
By DAVE GRAM
Associated Press / April 24, 2013

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — A lobbyist for an industry group supporting wind power apologized to a Vermont Senate committee on Wednesday after a witness she brought in called health concerns connected with wind power ‘‘hoo-hah,’’ nonsense and propaganda.

Gabrielle Stebbins, executive director of Renewable Energy Vermont, called the remarks of acoustics expert Geoff Levanthall unhelpful and offered an apology to the Senate Health and Welfare Committee after Leventhall testified at the hearing by phone from England.

‘‘There’s no scientific evidence behind what they (critics of wind power) say,’’ Leventhall said. ‘‘It’s all made-up, make-believe, trying to find something to object to, and trying to find something that will be difficult to disprove. It’s a technique, a propaganda technique, and they’ve been very, very effective.’’

Afterward, Stebbins said she regretted Leventhall’s comments. ‘‘I don’t think that’s helpful for the debate and, for the record, I do apologize for that.’’

Stebbins’ comments came at the end of the hearing in which two Vermont doctors — one of them critical of a wind power project near his home in Ira and of the industry generally — testified about what they said were ill health effects connected with wind power among people living near the turbines.

Leventhall did describe for the committee low-frequency, inaudible ‘‘infrasound,’’ that some blame on problems connected with wind turbines but that he said have less of an impact on people than sounds generated within the body, like the heartbeat.

The committee also heard from Luann Therrien, a Sheffield resident who said she and her husband have suffered severe sleep loss leading to depression since 16 turbines operated by First Wind began operating within about two miles of their home, with the closest being about a half mile away.

‘‘We did not oppose the project, not until it was up and running and creating noise,’’ Therrien said. ‘‘I have constant ringing in my ears that can be very distracting. My husband has been feeling so bad that he is currently unable to work. His doctor has pulled him from his job.’’

Discussion centered on sleep loss due to audible sounds from the turbines and on infrasound, the low-frequency noise inaudible to human ears but which some doctors have linked to ill health effects — sometimes called wind turbine syndrome.

Dr. Sandy Reider, a primary care provider practicing in Lyndonville, told the committee he had seen ‘‘a half dozen or so patients who are suffering from living in proximity to these turbines.’’ He told of one particularly tough case of a 33-year-old, healthy man who developed problems after a wind turbine began operation on Burke Mountain near his home.

The man ‘‘began to experience increasingly severe insomnia, waking multiple times at night with severe anxiety and heart palpitations, and experiencing during the daytime pressure headaches, nausea, ringing in his ears and difficulty concentrating,’’ Reider said.

Letter to Editor: Wind turbines, property values, and quality of place

April 24, 2013
As rural hills and mountain tops in Maine are rapidly developed by the wind industry, we must give thought to the impacts these projects have on Maine’s tourism industry and local property values.

Below is an excerpt from a letter submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection which is available on the DEP website and was written by Rainer and Gaby Engle of Switzerland, who bought their “American dream get-away” in Lincoln a few years ago.

The DEP is considering granting a permit to First Wind build an industrial wind facility on mountain ridges overlooking the Downeast Lakes region. The Engles know first-hand what kind of impact the Rollins wind project has had on the value of lakefront property in the nearby Lincoln Lakes region.

I know the Engles personally and know their well-kept, attractive cabin is just 3 feet from the water’s edge at Upper Pond, and the property has 550 feet of shore-frontage. Once the Rollins project was built, the owners faced 21 turbines – the sounds and sights of which dominated their lakeside experience. They lost their enjoyment in the property and listed their property for sale.

The Engles state in their letter, “We try to sell our camp since almost two years now: but no one is inquiring, since no one wants to see industry. One comes to Maine for nature and recreation. Getting away…”

What happens when a high-impact industrial facility creates, in essence, a “taking” of our property values — for some, our only investment? “Quality of place” is a big selling point in Maine. What happens when the quality of place disappears?

Karen Bessey Pease

Lexington Township

http://bangordailynews.com/2013/04/23/opinion/letters/wednesday-april-24-2013-wind-civil-rights-and-young-citizens/

From Victoria, Australia: local government steps back from wind turbines due to noise and health concerns

April 10, 2013

“… At least one family from Macarthur has completely abandoned their home due to sleep disturbance from wind turbine noise and several other neighbours take refuge away from their homes on a regular basis to prevent the cumulative impacts of turbine noise on sleep quality from completely destroying their health. These impacts were entirely predictable and the inevitable consequence of siting large industrial wind turbines too close to homes and workplaces”, she said.”

and …

“The global wind industry is well aware of NASA research from 1985 10 documenting the presence of wind turbine generated infrasound out to at least 10km”, Dr Laurie stated. There is no evidence that chronic exposure to these infrasound and low frequencies generated by large wind turbines is safe, despite the claims of the VESTAS CEO, and more engineering and health professionals speaking out publicly. 11 If this were a pharmaceutical, adequate safety tests would have been done before it was released onto the market. Why are the rules relating to the health safety of the public different for the wind industry?”

Media Release VCAT confirm damage to sleep and health

Quebec: due to health concerns, no turbines within 2 km of of residents

April 8, 2013

Patrice Laflamme, TVA Nouvelles, 3/25/13

The Quebec government has officially endorsed the amended interim control (RCI) of the Haut-Saint-Laurent surrounding these structures in its territory, which the council of mayors adopted on 9 January.

The Minister of Municipal Affairs, Regions and Land Occupancy (MAMROT), Sylvain Gaudreault, approved the new RCI in a letter dated March 13.

“The Regulation respects the policies of the government in terms of development. Therefore, under the Planning Act and planning, it shall take effect the day on which this notice is served,” the minister said in this letter for the prefect of the MRC, Alain Castagner.

In the territory of Haut-Saint-Laurent, this revised version of RCI forbids the erection of wind turbines 2000 m (2 km) from any dwelling and 1000 m (1 km) from any public road. (more…)

Will Fox Islands Wind do better with compliance noise measuring THIS summer?

April 7, 2013

Will Fox Islands Wind do better with compliance noise measuring THIS summer?

This is taken from the 2012 summer compliance report by Fox Islands Wind, the wind turbine operator on Vinalhaven. During a period of litigation and scrutiny, FIW did not even take care to be sure its noise measurement equipment was recording sound data carefully. It is as though FIW does not even care …

Falmouth selectmen, finance committee stand firm on removing turbines

April 7, 2013

An interesting development in the efforts to the public from wind turbine noise.

“Lessons from New York”

March 7, 2013

“Lessons from New York”

—Jack Sullivan, MS (Nuclear Physics, Cornell University), Rutland
Herald 2/14/13

As Vermonters grapple with the pros and cons of industrial wind power,
many of their questions may be answered by studying the track record of
northern New York wind projects.

This area has been host to hundreds of turbines for nearly five years.
The wind resource of northern Vermont is very close to that of northern
New York. We can certainly expect nearly the same performance from
turbines in both locations. I have tracked four northern New York
projects since their inception with a comprehensive study centered on
the Noble Chateaugay project, which has 71 GE 1.5 SLE turbines and is
capacity-rated at 106.5 megawatts. The capacity rating is the maximum
sustained output of the project.

The actual annual output of the Chateaugay was only 23 megawatts,
giving an efficiency (capacity factor ) of 21.6 percent. The other
northern New York projects had similar capacity factors. This is quite
far removed from the 30 percent to 35 percent commonly predicted by
wind developers. (more…)

“How Much Proof Do We Need?” by Malcolm Gladwell

February 25, 2013

Those who are skeptical about the science of noise impacts from industrial wind turbines might watch and listen to this lecture. The desire for proof as an excuse not to do anything …

(more…)

In Falmouth, Fairhaven turbine critics find hope

February 3, 2013

South Coast Today (Mass.)

By ARIEL WITTENBERG
awittenberg@s-t.com
February 01, 2013 12:00 AM

Fairhaven officials and critics of the town’s two turbines will be watching closely as Falmouth selectmen begin the process of removing two turbines there.

Kenneth Pottel, a member of Fairhaven’s chapter of WindWise, which advocates “responsible siting of industrial wind turbines,” said “emails were flying” on the group’s 100-person email list Thursday morning when members learned of the Falmouth decision.

“There’s a lot of energy and optimism about if this can transfer here,” Pottel said. (more…)

Wisconsin Towns Association calls for moratorium on wind turbine construction

January 31, 2013

January 24, 2013 5:10 am
Wisconsin State Journal | jnewman@madison.com

… The Wisconsin Towns Association voted Monday to adopt a resolution calling on the state of Wisconsin and the Public Service Commission to enact a moratorium on the construction of industrial wind turbines “until further studies are done, solutions are found and the state’s wind siting rule is modified.”

The towns association cited a Dec. 28 report to the PSC by four consulting firms that found noise from the Shirley Wind Farm in Denmark, may be affecting some neighboring farms. The report recommended more testing and research.

The report is part of testimony in connection with an application to build the 41-turbine Highland wind farm in St. Croix County, in northwest Wisconsin. The PSC is expected to take up the proposal by the end of February, PSC spokesman Matt Pagel said.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.